🔗 Share this article

Imagine this: a happy the Danish striker in a Napoli shirt. Next, juxtapose that with a sad-looking Benjamin Sesko sporting United's jersey, looking as if he's missed an open goal. Don't worry finding an actual photo of him missing; context is your adversary. Then, add some goal stats in a large, silly font. Remember some emoticons. Share it everywhere.

Would you point out that Højlund's tally features scores in the Champions League while Sesko isn't playing in Europe? Certainly not. And would you highlight that four of Højlund's goals came against weaker national sides, or that his national team is much stronger to Slovenia and creates many more chances. You run online for a large outlet, raw engagement is what pays the bills, United are the biggest draw, and context is the thing to avoid.

Thus the wheel of online material spins. The next job is to scan a lengthy interview with Peter Schmeichel and extract the part where he describes the signing of Sesko "weird". There's a bit, where he prefaces his remarks by saying, "I have nothing bad to say about Benjamin Sesko"... yes, cut that. No one needs that. Simply make sure "weird" and "Sesko" appear together in the headline. People will be furious.

This Time of Promise and Premature Judgment

The heart of fall has long been one of my preferred periods to observe football. The leaves swirl, winds shift, squads and strategies are still fresh, everything is new and yet everything is beginning to form. Key players of the season ahead are staking their claims. The transfer window is shut. No one is mentioning the multiple trophies yet. Everyone are still in the game. Right now, all is possibility.

However, for many of the same reasons, this period has long been one of my least favourite times to read about football. Because although nothing has yet been settled, opinions must be formed immediately. The City winger is resurgent. The German talent has been a major letdown. Is Antoine Semenyo the top performer in the league right now? Please an answer immediately.

Sesko as The Prime Example

And for numerous reasons, Benjamin Sesko feels like Patient Zero in this context, a player inextricably trapped between football's two countervailing, non-negotiable forces. The imperative to withhold final conclusions, allowing technical development and tactical sophistication to develop. And the imperative to produce permanent definitive judgment, a constant stream of opinions and memes, out-of-context condemnations and meaningless contrasts, a puzzle that can never truly be circled.

It is not my aim to offer a in-depth analysis of Sesko's stint at United so far. He has been in the lineup on four occasions in the top flight in a highly unpredictable team, scored two goals, and taken a mere of 116 touches. What exactly are we evaluating? And will I attempt to replicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's seminal masterwork "Argument Over Benjamin Sesko", in which two famous analysts duel passionately on a popular show over whether he needs 10 goals to be a success this season (one pundit), or whether it is more like twelve or thirteen (Wright).

A Cruel Environment

Despite this I enjoyed watching him at his former club: a powerful, fast sports car of a forward, playing in a team ideally suited to his talents: afforded the license to rampage but also the leeway to miss. Partly this is why Manchester United feels like the cruellest place he could possibly be right now: a place where "harsh judgments" are handed down in about the time it takes to load a pre-roll ad, the club with the largest and most pitiless gulf between the time and air he requires, and the time and air he is going to get.

We saw a case of this over the national team pause, when a viral chart conveniently informed us that the player had been deemed – by a wide margin – the poorest acquisition of the recent market by a survey of 20 agents. And of course, the press are not the only ones in such behavior. Club channels, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a suspiciously high number of fake followers: all parties with skin in the game is now basically aligned along the same principles, an environment explicitly geared for controversy.

The Psychological Toll

Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What is happening to us? Are we aware, on any level, what this endless stream of irritation is doing to our minds? Quite apart from the inherent strangeness of playing in the center of it all, aware on a bizarre butterfly-effect level that each aspect about them is now basically material, product, open-source property to be repackaged and exchanged.

And yes, partly this is because United are United, the entity that continues to feed the cycle, a big club that must constantly be generating the strong emotions. But also, partly this is a seasonal affliction, a swing of opinion most clearly and harshly observed at this season, roughly four weeks after the window has closed. All summer long we have been desiring players, eulogising them, salivating over them. Now, just a few weeks in, many of those very players are now being disdained as broken goods. Should we start to be concerned about Jamie Gittens? Did Arsenal actually need their striker necessary? What was the purpose of another expensive buy?

The Bigger Picture

It seems fitting that he faces Liverpool on Sunday: a team at once 13 months unbeaten at home in the league and somehow in their own situation of perceived turmoil, like submitting a a report on someone who went to the store half an hour ago. Too open. Their star finished. Alexander Isak an expensive flop. Arne Slot bald.

Maybe we have not yet quite grasped the way the storyline of football has begun to supplant football itself, to influence the way we watch it, an entire sport reoriented around talking points and immediate responses, something that occurs in the backdrop while we scroll through our devices, incapable to detach from the constant flow of takes and more takes. It may be this player bearing the brunt right now. But in a way, we're all losing a part of the experience here.